Boxedpress.com ha participado en el debate propiciado en el Financial Times sobre la independencia de Catalunya.
Después del artículo de Caietana Alvarez en el FT, boxedpress ha llenando el vacío de la posición catalana con una carta que intenta bloquear la intención de la diputada del PP de pretender justificar la prohibición del referéndum catalán con una conexión de la posición española con la británica para tratar de hacer un frente ‘anti-independentista’ a nivel europeo.
Pero el Reino Unido, que acepta la consulta escocesa y defiende el derecho de autodeterminación en Gibraltar, no deberia participar en esta ‘liga anti-democrática’ que propone Madrid.
Estamos en Facebook y en Twitter.
El artículo entero de Constanti Segarra publicado en el FT el pasado 24 de Febrero:
Catalonia, like Scotland, just wants to exercise its democràtic right
From Mr Constanti Segarra.
Sir, I write in response to Cayetana Alvarez’s article “Europe cannot afford to give in to separatists” (February 19). For the author, a member of Spain’s rightwing Popular party, Catalan and Scottish nationalism symbolise the “refutation of cultural diversity, the rejection of political pluralism and the restriction of individual rights”.
It’s odd that she uses this description since it’s been Spanish nationalism that has constantly battled and even banned cultural and linguistic diversity, and which has restricted individual and collective rights, and still does.
The legitimate and democratic aspirations of Catalonia and Scotland do not undermine the European project, but, instead, strengthen the democratic and inclusive character of the European institutions, which are envied elsewhere from Ukraine to Turkey. One should not allow Spanish nationalism, and its inherent resistance to democratic principles, to tarnish the European dream.
Europe, if it really is a union of democratic states, should not hide behind the “internal matter” catchphrase, and should clearly defend democracy, including the right of the people to decide their own future. And, when a member state doesn’t let the people vote, as is the case with Spain, Europe should intervene and mediate in order to guarantee the democratic processes.
Ms Alvarez tries to justify the prohibition of the Catalan referendum by seeking refuge in Britain, unsuccessfully trying to link her with Spain against the challenge of “regional separatists in Scotland and Catalonia”. But this link doesn’t exist.
While Spain has spent most of the 20th century under dictatorships, and has never recognised the self-determination right for either Catalonia or Gibraltar, Britain has enjoyed democracy for centuries and is still an active promoter of the values of freedom. As in other periods of history, this land of hope and glory can and must lead the democratic forces in Europe. In fact, Britain is already in the vanguard both by applying the self-determination right for Scotland and with the In/Out referendum in the EU.
Parties representing two-thirds of Catalonia’s parliament have an electoral mandate to hold an independence referendum. Spain, however, denies the right of Catalans to decide their future, objecting on the grounds of constitutional laws. It is such a flawed argument (they changed the Constitution in 24 hours when Angela Merkelasked them to, in order to limit the public deficit by law) that the Spanish rightwing nationalists need to justify their own position by constantly trying to link it to Britain’s.
But Britain knows better.